Un regard critique sur l'entrepreneuriat féminin : une synthèse des études des 25 dernières années
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Au cours des dernières années, plusieurs chercheurs se sont intéressés à l’entrepreneuriat féminin, principalement en tentant de comparer la situation des femmes avec celle des hommes. On a essayé, entre autres, de les distinguer sur les plans des motivations, du style de gestion, de la performance de leurs entreprises, des besoins de formation, de l’accès au financement, de la conciliation travail-famille et de leur participation à des réseaux d’affaires. La présente recherche propose une synthèse de ces études et fait ressortir tant leurs limites que les perspectives qu’elles ouvrent. Les résultats indiquent que peu de différences significatives engendrant une situation favorable ou défavorable à l’entrepreneure peuvent être véritablement démontrées et qu’il s’avère plus approprié de jeter un regard différent sur la question, notamment en s’intéressant à la femme entrepreneure dans son unicité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".