MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085930771 · doi:10.1021/jf803983w

RNAi-Mediated Suppression of <i>DET1</i> Alters the Levels of Carotenoids and Sinapate Esters in Seeds of Brassica napus

2009· article· en· W2085930771 on OpenAlexaff
Shu Wei, Xiang Li, Margaret Y. Gruber, Rong Li, Rong Zhou, Alireza Zebarjadi, Abdelali Hannoufa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarotenoidBrassicaBiologyZeaxanthinRNA interferenceGenetically modified cropsTransgeneLuteinFood scienceBotanyBiochemistryGeneRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotenoids and sinapate esters in Brassica napus affect the nutritional value of the seed. In this study, the B. napus regulatory gene DE-ETIOLATED1 (DET1), which is a negative regulator of light-mediated responses in plants and affects carotenoid and flavonoid pathways in tomato, was suppressed both constitutively and in a seed-specific manner by RNAi. Constitutive silencing of DET1 resulted in transgenic seeds with substantially elevated levels of lutein, beta-carotene, and zeaxanthin relative to nontransgenic seeds. Levels of these carotenoids were also enhanced but to a lesser extent in seeds of transgenic plants with seed-specific silencing of DET1. Moreover, sinapate esters 1,2-disinapoylgentiobiose and 1,2-di-O-sinapoylglucose were identified in the seeds using 1D and 2D NMR, as well as ESI-MS spectrum analyses. The levels of 1,2-di-O-sinapoylglucose in seeds in both sets of transgenic plants were lower compared to nontransgenic seeds. The results revealed that DET1 suppression in B. napus can increase the levels of carotenoids and reduce the levels of sinapate esters simultaneously in the seeds, thus enhancing their overall nutritional value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207