Molding Helmet Therapy in the Management of Sagittal Synostosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current surgical treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis often fails to produce a normal cephalic index; however, recent reports of early endoscopic suture release and postoperative helmet therapy promise improved cranial symmetry. The role of helmet therapy is critical in this approach, but there are few reports on the use of helmet therapy after craniosynostosis surgery. The authors present a retrospective review comparing the results of surgery alone versus surgery and postoperative banding in treating children diagnosed with sagittal synostosis. Cephalic index (CI) measurements and the divergence of the CI from the norm (DFN) were used to compare the banded and the non-banded groups. Included in the study were 21 children with sagittal craniosynostosis of whom 6 were treated with surgery alone and 15 were treated with surgery and postoperative banding. Preoperatively, both groups were significantly different from the norm (non-banded, P < 0.05; banded, P < 0.01), while postoperatively they were not significantly different from the norm. Statistically significant changes were present in the CIs of the banded group in the preoperative-follow-up interval (P < 0.01), while no significant changes occurred in the non-banded group during this same interval. Statistically significant changes in the DFN occurred in the preoperative-postoperative and preoperative-follow-up intervals of the banded group; however, these changes were not significant in the non-banded group during the same intervals. Correction toward a normal CI was seen in the banded group throughout the course of treatment, while this trend was not present in the non-banded group. Therefore, molding helmet therapy maintains the operative correction obtained and promotes more normal cranial growth patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it