Polynuclear lanthanide (Ln) complexes of a tri-functional hydrazone ligand – mononuclear (Dy), dinuclear (Yb, Tm), tetranuclear (Gd), and hexanuclear (Gd, Dy, Tb) examples
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lanthanide coordination chemistry of a tri-functional vanillin-hydrazone-oxime ligand reveals a variety of different products, depending on reaction conditions, with mono-nuclear (Dy), dinuclear (Yb, Tm), tetranuclear (Gd) and hexanuclear (Gd, Tb, Dy) examples. The Ln6 (Ln = Gd, Dy, Tb) complexes form in the presence of both triethylamine and acetic acid, and have unique, flat hexanuclear structures built on a μ3-O bridged triangular core, with the six lanthanide ions bridged further through μ-acetate and μ-Ohydrazone connections in an expanded fused triangular array. Similar reaction conditions with Yb(III) and Tm(III) lead preferentially to dinuclear systems, while in the presence of a competitive benzoate ligand a rectangular Gd4 complex results. Variable temperature DC magnetic data for the Gd(III) complexes reveal weak antiferromagnetic exchange. AC magnetic data on the other polynuclear complexes down to 2 K, both in the absence and presence of external bias fields, revealed no significant out of phase signals normally indicative of SMM behavior. However, the mononuclear Dy(III) complex shows frequency dependent AC signals and maxima in the temperature range 2-20 K in the presence of an external bias field, indicative of SMM behaviour, with Ueff = 36(1) K, and τ0 = 4.4(2) × 10(-6) s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it