Left Ventricular Diastolic Function during the First Month of Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: In order to assess possible changes in myocardial relaxation occurring during the neonatal period, M-mode echocardiograms were recorded serially in 9 normal term infants and in another group of 10 one-month-old infants. The tracings were studied with an M-mode calculator. Although individual variations were greater in the data collected during the first 24 h, no significant difference was found in the indices of diastolic function of the left ventricle during the first 4 days of age. The following changes were observed between data recorded at 4 days and 1 month, respectively: normalized peak rate of left ventricle filling, 4.03 vs. 4.71 cm/s; diastolic peak velocity of early posterior motion of aortic root, 1.89 vs. 5.15 cm/s; peak velocity of left ventricle posterior wall motion in diastole, 3.31 vs. 3.50 cm/s; mitral valve EF slope, 59.05 vs. 84.92 mm/s; left ventricle isometric relaxation time, 43.88 vs. 28.50 ms. IN CONCLUSION: (1) greater individual variations are observed in indices of left ventricle diastolic function during the first day of life, and (2) significant increase in left ventricle compliance occurs during the first month of life. These changes should play a critical role in the clinical course of newborn with cardiopulmonary disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".