Pour une rhétorique du quotidien dans la littérature québécoise moderne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Seja sob a forma quase oral dos monólogos de Clémence DesRochers seja na trama narrativa do romance Des Nouvelles d’Édouard, uma retórica do cotidiano se perfila nas obras literárias quebequenses; ela se faz presente a fim de provocar no leitor uma distância crítica. Por figuras de valor textual como o clichê e a ironia, ela oferece assim à reflexão uma transgressão das normas literárias e sugere uma ultrapassagem dos nossos reflexos de interpretação.Palavras-chave: Literatura canadense; língua francesa; Clémence DesRochers; Michel Tremblay; retórica. Résumé: Que ce soit sous la forme quasi-orale des monologues de Clémence DesRochers, ou dans la trame narrative du roman de Michel Tremblay, Des Nouvelles d’Édouard, une rhétorique du quotidien se profile dans les oeuvres littéraires québécoises; elle prend pour toile afin de provoquer chez le lecteur une distance critique. Par des figures à portée textuelle comme le clichê et l’ironie, elle offre alors à la réflexion une transgression des normes littéraires et suggère un dépassement de nos réflexes d’interprétation.Mots-clés: Littérature canadienne; langue française; Clémence DesRochers; Michel Tremblay; rhétorique.Keywords: Canadian literature; French; Clémence DesRochers; Michel Tremblay; rhetoric.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".