MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086166825 · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg061

A Toxicokinetic Model of Malathion and Its Metabolites as a Tool to Assess Human Exposure and Risk through Measurements of Urinary Biomarkers

2003· article· en· W2086166825 on OpenAlexaff
Michèle Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicological Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxicokineticsMalathionChemistryUrineToxicodynamicsExcretionChromatographyIn vivoToxicologyMetabolismPharmacologyPesticideBiochemistryMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A toxicokinetic model is proposed to predict the time evolution of malathion and its metabolites, mono- and dicarboxylic acids (MCA, DCA) and phosphoric derivatives (dimethyl dithiophosphate [DMDTP], dimethyl thiophosphate [DMTP], and dimethyl phosphate [DMP]) in the human body and excreta, under a variety of exposure routes and scenarios. The biological determinants of the kinetics were established from published data on the in vivo time profiles of malathion and its metabolites in the blood and urine of human volunteers exposed by intravenous, oral, or dermal routes. In the model, body and excreta compartments were used to represent the time varying amounts of each of the following: malathion, MCA, DCA, DMDTP, DMTP, and DMP. The dynamic of intercompartment exchanges was described mathematically by a differential equation system that ensured conservation of mass at all times. The model parameters were determined by statistically adjusting the explicit solution of the differential equations to the experimental human data. Simulations provide a close approximation to kinetic data available in the published literature. When simulating a dermal exposure to malathion, the main route of entry for workers, the model predicts that it takes an average of 11.8 h to recover half of the absorbed dose of malathion eventually excreted in urine as metabolites, compared to 3.2 h following an intravenous injection and 4.0 h after oral administration. This shows that following a dermal exposure, the absorption rate governs the urinary excretion rate of malathion metabolites because the dermal absorption rate is much slower than biotransformation and renal clearance processes. The model served to establish biological reference values for malathion metabolites in urine since it allows links to be made between the absorbed dose of malathion and the time course of cumulative amounts of metabolites excreted in urine. From the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) of 0.61 micromol/kg/day derived from the data of Moeller and Rider (1962), the model predicts corresponding biological reference values for MCA, DCA, and phosphoric derivatives of 44, 13, and 62 nmol/kg, respectively, in 24-h urine samples. The latter were used to assess the health risk of workers exposed to malathion in botanical greenhouses, starting from urinary measurements of MCA and DCA metabolites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicological SciencesSame topicPesticide Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207