Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many techniques have been developed to measure the difficulty of forecasting data from an observed time series. This paper introduces a measure which we call the "forecast entropy" designed to measure the predictability of a time series. We use attractors reconstructed from the time series and the distributions in the regular and tangent spaces of the data which comprise the attractor. We then consider these distributions on different scales. We present a formula for calculating the forecast entropy. To provide a standard of predictability, we define an idealized random system whose forecast entropy will be maximal; we then use this measure to rescale the forecast entropy to lie in the range [0,1]. The time series obtained from several chaotic systems as well as from a pseudorandom system are studied using this measure. We present evidence that the forecast entropy can be used as a tool for determining optimal delays and embedding dimensions used for reconstructing better attractors. We also show that the forecast entropy of a random system has completely different characteristics from that of a deterministic one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it