MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2086190933 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/2/1595

THE ARECIBO LEGACY FAST ALFA SURVEY. VII. A NEUTRAL HYDROGEN CLOUD COMPLEX IN THE VIRGO CLUSTER

2009· article· en· W2086190933 on OpenAlexaff
Brian R. Kent, Kristine Spekkens, Riccardo Giovanelli, Martha P. Haynes, Emmanuel Momjian, Juan R. Cortés, Eduardo Hardy, Andrew A. West

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirgo ClusterPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomyHaloGalaxy clusterCluster (spacecraft)Intracluster mediumDark matter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present observations of an H i cloud complex most likely located in the Virgo galaxy cluster, first reported by Kent et al. The complex consists of five clouds, detected in the dataset of the ALFALFA extragalactic H i survey at Arecibo. The clouds have radial velocities between cz ☉ ∼ 480 and 610 km s −1 . At the Virgo cluster distance, they are spread over a projected span of 170 kpc and have H i masses ranging from 0.48 to 1.7 × 10 8 M ☉ . The overall H i mass of the complex is 5.1 × 10 8 M ☉ . The clouds' velocity widths vary between 50 and 250 km s −1 . New results of follow-up aperture synthesis observations conducted with the Very Large Array are also presented, which yield a higher-resolution view of two of the clouds in the complex. These two resolved clouds show no evidence of symmetry in the gas distribution or of any ordered motions. The possibility that the complex is a group of primordial objects, embedded in their own dark matter halo is thought to be unlikely. Scenarios in which the clouds have been removed from the disk of a galaxy traveling at high speed through the intracluster medium are considered. The most likely among those is thought to be one where the clouds were separated from NGC 4445 at a time >0.5 Gyr ago. The orbital velocity of the clouds and the putative parent galaxy would now be seen at a relatively large angle with respect to the line of sight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→