MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086199047 · doi:10.4155/fmc.11.133

Novel Cosuspension Metered-Dose Inhalers for the Combination Therapy of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma

2011· review· en· W2086199047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Medicinal Chemistry · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersPearl Therapeutics
KeywordsMetered-dose inhalerMedicineAsthmaInhalerPulmonary diseaseIntensive care medicineDiseaseCombination therapyPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressurized metered dose inhaler is the most common inhaled dosage form, ideally suited for delivering the highly potent compounds that medicinal chemists typically discover for respiratory therapeutic targets. The clinical benefit of combination therapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been well established, and many of the new discovery candidates are likely to be studied in the clinic as combination drugs even at early stages of development. We present a novel pressurized metered dose inhaler formulation approach to enable consistent aerosol performance of a respiratory therapeutic whether it is emitted from a single-, double- or triple-therapy product. This should enable rapid nonclinical and clinical assessment whether alone or in combination with other drugs, without the challenge of in vitro performance dissimilarity across product types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it