MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2086204122 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081160

Hemodynamic Impact of Absent or Reverse End-Diastolic Flow in the Two Umbilical Arteries in Growth-Restricted Fetuses

2013· article· en· W2086204122 on OpenAlexaff
Édouard Lecarpentier, A. Cordier, Francine Proulx, J. Fouron, L. Gitz, G. Grangé, Alexandra Benachi, Vassilis Tsatsaris

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsUmbilical arteryDuctus venosusCardiologyInternal medicineAnatomyFetusAnesthesiaPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine if bilateral absent or reverse end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the two umbilical arteries (UAs) at the perivesical (PVC) segment represents a more severe degree of hemodynamic compromise than unilateral ARED flow at the PVC segment in singleton pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. One hundred nine fetuses with IUGR underwent a total of 225 ultrasound (US) examinations. We measured the pulsatility index (PI) from the two UAs at the PVC segment, UA in the free floating cord (FFC), middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and the aortic isthmus blood flow index (IFI). Three groups were classified according to bilateral positive end-diastolic (PED) flow, unilateral ARED flow or bilateral ARED flow in the UAs at the PVC segment. RESULTS: The proportions of US examinations with PED flow, unilateral ARED flow and bilateral ARED flow in the UAs were 54.7%, 20.4%, and 24.9%, respectively. At the last US examination, the IFI z-scores were significantly lower in the bilateral ARED group (-6.28 ± 4.30) compared to the unilateral ARED group (-1.72 ± 3.18, p<0.05) and the bilateral PED group (-0.83 ± 2.36, p<0.05), the DV-PI z-scores were significantly higher in the bilateral ARED group (2.15 ± 3.79) compared to the bilateral PED group (0.64 ± 1.50, p<0.05). Before 32 weeks of gestation, the interval between US examination and delivery was significantly shorter in the bilateral ARED group (8.9 days ± 8.2) than the unilateral ARED group (15.9 days ± 13.4, p<0.05) and the bilateral PED group (30.3 days ± 25.7, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in fetal blood fluxes between left and right UA. Doppler examination at the PVC segment significantly improves the comparability of UA-PI between two successive US examinations and allows a longitudinal and independent hemodynamic investigation of each UA. Examination of a single UA in free floating cord may miss a large fraction of unilateral ARED flow. In singleton IUGR fetuses, a bilateral ARED flow in the UAs at the PVC segment indicates more severe hemodynamic compromise and worse fetal conditions than unilateral ARED flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→