MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086207326 · doi:10.1080/15265160802617894

Enthusiasm for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Often Overlooks Its Dependence on Task Selection and Performance

2009· letter· en· W2086207326 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Bell, Éric Racine

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2009
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingEnthusiasmMagnetic resonance imagingTask (project management)Selection (genetic algorithm)PsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceComputer scienceRadiologySocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the target article “Ethical challenges and interpretive difficulties with non-clinical applications of pediatric functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI),” Fenton and colleagues (2009) bring...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207