MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mass Transport and Powder Source Evolution in Sublimation Growth of SiC Bulk Crystals

2001· article· en· W2086241555 on OpenAlexaff
D. S. Karpov, O.V. Bord, S. Yu. Karpov, Alexander I. Zhmakin, M.S. Ramm, Yuri Makarov

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSublimation (psychology)PorosityCrystal growthMass transportGranule (geology)Composite materialChemical engineeringCrystallographyEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study mass transport in SiC powder charge, employed as a source of reactive species in SiC bulk crystal growth, coupled with the species transport in the clearance between the powder and the seed. The study is aimed at finding correlation between growth conditions and powder evolution during a long-term growth process. We also examine how the growth conditions and the powder properties (porosity and mean size of SiC granule) influence SiC growth rate at the seed. The theoretical results are compared with available experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207