MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086271146 · doi:10.1063/1.3490185

Thermal conduction in thin films measured by optical surface thermal lensing

2010· article· en· W2086271146 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Philippe Bourgoin, Guy-Germain Allogho, Alain Haché

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal conductionMaterials scienceThermal conductivityThin filmThermalAluminiumTinLaserOpticsDrop (telecommunication)Composite materialAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal conduction across thin films is measured optically by using the surface thermal lensing effect. Pump-probe laser measurements combined with numerical modeling are used to study thermal conduction in a variety of materials as thin as 10 nm. The method is relatively simple, robust, rapid, and offers an alternative to current techniques. Thermal conductivity in gold films is found to drop from 300 to 100 W/Km when the film thickness is reduced from 2000 to 100 nm. Results for silver, tin and aluminum films are also presented and compared with results from other studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207