Diblock Copolymer Micelles Deliver Hydrophobic Protoporphyrin IX for Photodynamic Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymeric micelles are emerging as an effective drug delivery system for hydrophobic photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy (PDT). The objective of this study was to investigate the formulation of hydrophobic protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) with MePEG(5000)-b-PCL(4100) [methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly (caprolactone)] diblock copolymers and to compare their PDT response to that of free PpIX. The photophysical and photochemical properties of the polymeric PpIX micelles were studied by measuring absorbance and fluorescence spectra, PpIX-loading efficiency and stability, the micelle particle size and morphology, as well as singlet oxygen luminescence and lifetime. The spherical micelles have a high PpIX-loading efficiency of 82.4% and a narrow size distribution with a mean diameter of 52.2 +/- 6.4 nm. The cellular uptake of PpIX in RIF-1 cells using PpIX micelles was approximately two-fold higher than that for free PpIX. Free PpIX and PpIX formulated in micelles exhibited similar subcellular localization in or around the cellular plasma membrane, as demonstrated using fluorescence microscopy. In vitro PDT results showed that the PpIX micelles have markedly increased photocytotoxicity over that with free PpIX, by nearly an order of magnitude at the highest light dose used. The micelles alone had no evident phototoxicity or dark toxicity. These findings suggest that MePEG(5000)-b-PCL(4100) diblock copolymer micelles have great potential as a drug delivery system for hydrophobic photodynamic sensitizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".