Scalable and Efficient Power Control Algorithms for Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient optimization techniques are important to manage interference in emerging dense wireless networks. Here, we address interference management through power control as a general utility maximization problem. For the class of utility functions that are concave in the logarithm of the optimization variables, we propose a power control algorithm based on fixed-point iterations. The iterations converge to the globally optimal power vector. One key benefit is that, for a network with N transmitters and a centralized implementation of the power control algorithm, the computational complexity per iteration of the algorithm is O(N <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ). When implemented in a distributed fashion and allowing for a signaling complexity of N messages per iteration, the computation complexity is reduced to O(N). We show that the proposed centralized and distributed versions of the algorithm converge to the optimal power vector at a linear rate. Our numerical results suggest that in most instances, the algorithm takes fewer than ten iterations to converge, even fewer if the initialization is close to the optimal power vector. The proposed algorithm is, therefore, very efficient for power control in slowly fading channels. Furthermore, unlike previous works in the literature, the proposed algorithm does not require the objective function to be separable into a sum of individual utilities. As an example, we present results for power control in a two-hop decode-and-forward cooperative relay network and illustrate the performance gains due to interference management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".