MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086294628 · doi:10.7202/1000040ar

Euler et les réseaux harmoniques

2010· article· fr· W2086294628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Franck Jedrzejewski

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersections Canadian Journal of Music · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, on montre que le Tentamen de Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) apporte une solution arithmétique et musicale aux problèmes évoqués par Leibniz dans sa lettre à Christian Goldbach du 17 avril 1712, et que, contrairement à une idée largement répandue, les genres musicaux ( genus musicum ) ont été repris et développés par des théoriciens de la musique et des compositeurs. Tout d’abord par le physicien Adriaan Fokker (1887–1972) qui a sollicité de nombreux compositeurs hollandais, puis par l’école américaine qui, avec Harry Partch (1901–1974), Ervin Wilson (1928) et Ben Johnston (1926), a poursuivi le développement de ces théories dans l’exploration expérimentale de l’intonation juste et des univers non tempérés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersections Canadian Journal of MusicSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207