Jurgen Moltmann and Pentecostalism(s): Toward a Cultural Theology of the Spirit
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a theological movement, Pentecostalism is entering a new phase marked by attempts to give substance to its central theological beliefs. To that end, Pentecostals have entered into conversation with Protestant and evangelical theologians as partners in framing their unique beliefs. In this article, I intend to celebrate the entrance of Pentecostalism as a theological conversation partner in the academy. I seek to continue the conversation that other Pentecostals have begun with the theological work of Jörgen Moltmann. On a second note, focusing particularly on Moltmann's kenotic view of the Spirit, and adapting United States Latino/a theology's contribution on popular religion as locus theologicus, I propose a reading of the activity of the Spirit as a cultural kenosis. This, I argue, allows a new understanding of Pentecostalism's emphasis on the work of the Spirit. It also establishes new avenues for Pentecostalism to contribute to ecumenical debates in its affirmation of ethnocultural context as the unique place of the Spirit's activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it