THE HERMENEUTICS OF SIKH MUSIC (<i>RĀG</i>) AND WORD (<i>SHABAD</i>)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
an international conference under the title 'Hermeneutics of Sikh Music (ra g) and Word (shabad)' was held at Hofstra University, Long Island, New York.The conference brought together 17 scholars and music practitioners from across disciplinary boundaries, from India, The Netherlands, Italy, England, Canada and the US.Some papers from the conference have been collated and edited to appear in this issue of Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory -some of the remaining papers will form a second issue to come out in due course. Conference reportThe Hermeneutics of Sikh Music (ra g) and Word (shabad) conference broke new ground in the study of the Guru Granth Sa hib (GGS) by reinvigorating attempts to make academic reflection (largely within the humanities) take much more seriously the importance of its musical dimension.The bringing together of philosophy/religion (scripture) and aesthetics/fine arts (music) in the study of Sikh traditions was thus a key aim of the conference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it