MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086363322 · doi:10.1109/wsc.1990.129503

A tutorial GENETIK simulation and scheduling

2002· article· en· W2086363322 on OpenAlexaff
Kieran Concannon, P.-J. Becker

Bibliographic record

Venue1990 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInsight Design Labs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Job shop schedulingSoftware engineeringDistributed computingOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GENETIK is a powerful general-purpose visual interactive modeling system that includes both simulation and scheduling modules. The authors present a detailed description of the GENETIK system and its features, with examples of its use as a DSS generator and a simulation modeling tool, as well as its growing application in the role of planning and scheduling. It is noted that GENETIK provides a visually interactive means of giving analysts a fast, easy and powerful tool for developing customized simulation and scheduling systems. Data, pictures, logic and interactions are the four key requirements in building a GENETIK model. By using simple facilities to handle these four requirements, GENETIK makes it possible to build a model of any type of problem, however complex it is. Answers from a GENETIK simulation or scheduling model make it possible to re-assess what the real problem is or prompt fresh ideas for solving it.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1990 Winter Simulation Conference ProceedingsSame topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207