La citation visuelle contemporaine. Le cas du changement de médium dans l’oeuvre Le Radeau de la Méduse (100 Mile House) 1 d’Adad Hannah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article porte sur la citation dans l’imagerie contemporaine, plus exactement sur le transfert de l’image citée dans un autre médium en prenant à témoin l’oeuvre Le Radeau de la Méduse (100 Mile House) 1 d’Adad Hannah. L’objectif est de démontrer comment, en choisissant un médium autre que celui de l’image citée, l’artiste citant se présente et se représente comme réformateur des arts. Pour le citateur, l’acte citationnel repose sur deux objectifs qui se confrontent : celui de s’identifier à l’autre cité et de reconnaître la valeur exemplaire du modèle; celui de s’approprier l’image source et de la recomposer par le biais d’une pratique personnelle dans un contexte qui favorise les mélanges et les déplacements de tous ordres, notamment à l’égard des hiérarchies conventionnelles qui s’en trouvent ainsi renouvelées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".