Preparation, Characterization, and Magnetic Behavior of the Ln Derivatives (Ln = Nd, La) of a 2,6-Diiminepyridine Ligand and Corresponding Dianion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An unprecedented Nd[2,6-[[2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)]NdI(2)(THF) (1) complex was prepared by oxidizing metallic Nd with I(2) in THF and in the presence of 2,6-[[2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N). The magnetic behavior at variable T clearly indicated that the complex should be regarded as a trivalent Nd atom antiferromagnetically coupled to a radical anion. By using the doubly deprotonated form of the diimino pyridine ligand [[2,6-[[2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N-C=CH(2)](2)(C(5)H(3)N)](2-) (2) the corresponding trivalent complexes [[2,6-[[2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N-C=CH(2)](2)(C(5)H(3)N)]Ln (THF)](mu-Cl)(2)[Li(THF)(2)].0.5 (hexane) [Ln = Nd (3), La (4)] were obtained and characterized. Reduction of these species afforded electron transfer to the ligand system which gave ligand dimerization via C-C bond formation through one of the two ene-amido functions of each molecule. The resulting dinuclear [[([2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N-C=(CH(2)))(C(5)H(3)N)([2,6-(i-Pr)(2)C(6)H(5)]N=CCH(2))]Ln(THF)(2)(mu-Cl)[Li(THF)(3)])(2).2(THF) [Ln = Nd (5), La (6)] were isolated and characterized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it