MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086412675 · doi:10.1002/ar.21236

Regulation of Kidney Development by Shp2: An Unbiased Stereological Analysis

2010· article· en· W2086412675 on OpenAlexaff
Frank David, Luise A. Cullen‐McEwen, Xue Wu, Stephen R. Zins, Julie Lin, John F. Bertram, Benjamin G. Neel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Anatomical Record · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteBrigham and Women's Hospital
KeywordsStereologyComputer scienceMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genes that regulate renal branching morphogenesis are likely to indirectly regulate nephron endowment, but few have been validated to do so in vivo. PTPN11, which encodes the nonreceptor protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2, acts downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases to modulate the Ras-MAPK pathway and has been implicated in branching morphogenesis in vitro and in invertebrates, and is therefore a candidate in vivo regulator of nephron number. In this work, heterozygous null mutant Shp2(+/-) mice at postnatal days 30-35 were compared with their wild-type (WT) littermates using unbiased stereology to determine if, indeed, the former had decreased nephron number due to their 50% decrease in gene/protein dosage. Although there was a trend toward decreases in total glomerular (nephron) number and kidney volume in Shp2(+/-) mice compared with WT, neither difference was statistically significant (11310 vs. 12198 glomeruli, P = 0.22; 62.8 mm(3) vs. 66.0 mm(3) renal volume; P = 0.40). We conclude that loss of 50% gene/protein dosage of PTPN11/Shp2 is insufficient to affect glomerular (and thereby nephron) number in mouse kidneys in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Anatomical RecordSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207