A Novel Method in Predicting Immediate Postoperative Facial Nerve Function Post Acoustic Neuroma Excision
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: To determine whether the percentage calculated by dividing the amplitude of postexcision direct facial nerve stimulus responses (at pontomedullary junction) by the amplitude of distal ipsilateral transcutaneous (stylomastoid region) maximal stimulus responses and response amplitude progression by increasing stimulus intensities have predictive value for determining normal or near-normal (House-Brackmann Grade 1 or 2) immediate postoperative facial nerve function. STUDY DESIGN: Intraoperative recordings of three muscle groups: 1) frontalis, 2) orbicularis oculi, and 3) orbicularis oris. Postexcision direct facial nerve stimulation at the pontomedullary junction and transcutaneous maximal facial nerve stimulation at the ipsilateral stylomastoid region and their associated response amplitudes were recorded. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent acoustic neuroma surgery from January 2004 to March 2006 with intraoperative facial nerve monitoring and an intact facial nerve after tumor excision were included. Recordings were available for 38 patients. RESULTS: With a stimulus intensity of 0.3 mA at the root exit zone, there was an 81% positive predictive value in patients that exhibited a compound action potential of greater than 20% of maximum (sensitivity, 81%). This increased to 93% when the compound action potential was greater than 50% of maximum. When the amplitude increase was greater than 5 microV, there was a 77% positive predictive value (sensitivity, 87%). CONCLUSION: The percentage of the response amplitude of direct facial nerve stimulation at the pontomedullary junction when compared with the maximum response amplitude of ipsilateral transcutaneous stimulation at the stylomastoid foramen is a good predictor of normal to near-normal immediate postoperative facial nerve function. Progression of amplitude response also seems to be a good predictor of normal to near-normal immediate postoperative facial nerve function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".