MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086523899 · doi:10.1063/1.1767625

Partially invariant solutions of models obtained from the Nambu–Goto action

2004· article· en· W2086523899 on OpenAlexaff
A. M. Grundland, A. J. Hariton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Lie groupSymmetry groupMathematicsPartial differential equationOrdinary differential equationScalar fieldMathematical physicsSeparable partial differential equationAlgebraic numberAction (physics)Differential equationPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsDifferential algebraic equationQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of partially invariant solutions is discussed in the framework of the group analysis of models derived from the Nambu–Goto action. In particular, we consider the nonrelativistic Chaplygin gas and the relativistic Born–Infeld theory for a scalar field. Using a general systematic approach based on subgroup classification methods, nontrivial partially invariant solutions with defect structure δ=1 are constructed. For this purpose, a classification of the subgroups of the Lie point symmetry group, which have generic orbits of dimension 2, has been performed. These subgroups allow us to introduce the corresponding symmetry variables and next to reduce the initial equations to different nonequivalent classes of partial differential equations and ordinary differential equations. The latter can be transformed to standard form and, in some cases, solved in terms of elementary and Jacobi elliptic functions. This results in a large number of new partially invariant solutions, which are determined to be either reducible or irreducible with respect to the symmetry group. Some physical interpretation of the results in the area of fluid dynamics and field theory are discussed. The solutions represent traveling and centered waves, algebraic solitons, kinks, bumps, cnoidal and snoidal waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207