MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086528781 · doi:10.1364/josab.29.002929

Engineering of effective second-order nonlinearity in uniform and chirped gratings

2012· article· en· W2086528781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratingOpticsNonlinear systemRippleBandwidth (computing)Materials sciencePosition (finance)FabricationWavelengthChirpQuasi-phase-matchingSecond-harmonic generationPhysicsLaserComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dependence of second harmonic generation conversion efficiency resulting from the position of poled regions of the second-order nonlinearity in uniform and chirped gratings in ferroelectric materials has been studied analytically and numerically. The displacement of the poled region’s position from a specific location in second-order nonlinear materials can introduce a wavelength shift in a uniform grating’s second harmonic intensity peak and strongly influences the bandwidth and ripple in the harmonic conversion response of chirped gratings. We propose that the poled regions should be located at specific positions within the single period to minimize the ripples and achieve a desired nonlinearity function, and also to significantly improve tolerance to fabrication errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it