MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086553938 · doi:10.1017/s0952523802191139

A structural basis for omnidirectional connections between starburst amacrine cells and directionally selective ganglion cells in rabbit retina, with associated bipolar cells

2002· article· en· W2086553938 on OpenAlexafffund
Edward V. Famiglietti

Bibliographic record

VenueVisual Neuroscience · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBistratified cellRetinaGiant retinal ganglion cellsNeuroscienceRetinal wavesGanglionBiologyIntrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cellsAmacrine cellCholinergicParasol cellCell biologyAnatomyChemistryRetinal ganglion cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells of rabbit retina are of two principal types. ON DS ganglion cells prefer low velocity in one of three directions of movement and project axons to the accessory optic system (AOS), whereas ON-OFF DS ganglion cells prefer higher velocity in one of four directions and project to tectum and thalamus. Each has a distinct, recognizable dendritic morphology, based upon the correlation of form, physiology, and central projections. In previous Golgi studies, ON and ON-OFF DS cells were found to be partly co-stratified, and ON-OFF DS cells were found to co-stratify with starburst amacrine (SA) cells, the cholinergic amacrine cells of the retina, which also contain elevated levels of GABA. SA cells are radially symmetrical, have synaptic boutons in a distal annular zone of its dendritic tree, are presynaptic primarily to ganglion cell dendrites, co-stratify with ON-OFF DS ganglion cells, and contain the neurotransmitters shown pharmacologically to be involved in DS responses. For these reasons, SA cells are thought to play a role in the DS mechanism. Several models of this mechanism have utilized SA cell dendritic geometry in a centrifugal, radial format to impose directional inputs on DS ganglion cells. The opportunity to examine Golgi preparations containing ON DS ganglion cells that exhibit dendritic field overlap with both starburst amacrine cells and ON-OFF DS ganglion cells has resulted in several new findings. Co-stratification of ON DS ganglion cells and SA cells was demonstrated directly. Secondly, the boutons of single starburst amacrine cells make close contact in different lamellae of the starburst substratum in sublamina b of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) with three adjacent ON-OFF DS ganglion cells, which because of their considerable dendritic-field overlap must prefer different directions of motion. Thirdly, nearby presynaptic boutons of single SA cells make close contact with both ON and ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells. Single SA cells thus traverse all the lamellae of the starburst/cholinergic substratum. Fourthly, no directional bias is shown by vectors connecting the origins of dendritic sectors and distal synaptic boutons of starburst amacrine cells in those sectors that are in close contact with the dendrites of single ON or ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells. Fifthly, at least two distinct types of cone bipolar cell, nb1 and nb2, participate in the neural circuitry of directional selectivity for ON and ON-OFF DS ganglion cells, and nb1 cells co-stratify with ON DS cells. As a consequence of the second, third, and fourth points, starburst amacrine cells appear to be indiscriminate in their connections with DS ganglion cells, and therefore are unlikely to be the primary conduits for directionally selective information to retinal ganglion cells. This result is consistent with pharmacological studies showing that cholinergic antagonists do not block directional selectivity and a study showing that laser-ablation of SA cells does not reduce the directional selectivity of overlapping ON-OFF DS ganglion cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVisual NeuroscienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207