MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086559927 · doi:10.1080/02533839.2007.9671285

Invariant solutions of the equation of motion for a sphere composed of Blatz‐Ko material

2007· article· en· W2086559927 on OpenAlexaff
Hin‐Chi Lei, Sheng‐Wei Chen, John M. Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsOdeInvariant (physics)Separable spaceOrdinary differential equationSingularityMathematical analysisMathematicsRiccati equationPartial differential equationDifferential equationMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The nonlinear partial differential equation governing the spherically symmetric dynamic deformations of Blatz‐Ko materials is studied. The Lie groups and three invariant solutions of the governing equation are derived. Two of the invariant solutions are in separable form. The governing equation of the invariant solution in non‐separable form is a singular second order non‐autonomous ordinary differential equation (ODE). We transform this ODE to an autonomous ODE successfully and analyze its trajectories in the phase plane. By doing this we can capture the global behaviors of the solutions for the ODE. Especially, we can figure out what kind of problems will have singularity. The invariant solution in non‐separable form studied in this paper is interesting because it shows that when localization or blowing up of some physical quantities occurs close to the outer boundary of a Blatz‐Ko sphere the sphere may still look normal, that is, the distribution of the radial deformation as well as the boundary data still vary moderately. Therefore this special invariant solution gives us new insights about the behaviors of Blatz‐Ko materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Chinese Institute of EngineersSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207