MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086606941 · doi:10.1139/v05-215

Combining HD exchange and ESI-FAIMS-MS for detecting gas-phase conformers of equine cytochrome c

2005· article· en· W2086606941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Randy W. Purves, Barbara Ells, David A. Barnett, Roger Guevremont

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryConformational isomerismIon-mobility spectrometryElectrospray ionizationHydrogen–deuterium exchangeMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrosprayIonCytochrome cChromatographyMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conformers of equine cytochrome c were investigated in the gas phase using a combination of high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) and hydrogen–deuterium (H–D) exchange. Electrospray generated ions of equine cytochrome c were exposed to a low concentration of D 2 O vapour while being transported by a flow of nitrogen through a FAIMS device. During this transport period of about 250 ms in the FAIMS analyzer, the various conformers of multiply charged ions of cytochrome c were simultaneously undergoing H–D exchange and being separated from each other. The extent of H–D exchange was calculated from the observed m/z of conformers after exposure to D 2 O vapour in FAIMS. The complementary nature of these two methods resulted in observations supporting a greater number of conformers (e.g., at least 11 conformers were identified for the +16 charge state) than would be expected by analyzing the FAIMS data and the H–D exchange data independently.Key words: FAIMS, H–D exchange, mass spectrometry, protein conformations, electrospray ionization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207