MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Free Access to Landsat Imagery

2008· letter· en· W2086620533 on OpenAlexaff
Curtis E. Woodcock, Richard G. Allen, Martha C. Anderson, Alan Belward, Robert Bindschadler, Warren B. Cohen, Feng Gao, Samuel N. Goward, Dennis Helder, Eileen H. Helmer, R. R. Nemani, Lazaros Oreopoulos, J. Schott, Prasad S. Thenkabail, Éric Vermote, James E. Vogelmann, Michael A. Wulder, Randolph H. Wynne

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingSatellite imageryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

![Figure][1] Free image. This Landsat 5 image of the southeastern corner of the Black Sea is part of the general U.S. archive that will be accessible for free under the new USGS policy. CREDIT: BOSTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR REMOTE SENSING We are entering a new era in the Landsat Program, the oldest and most venerable of our Earth-observing satellite programs. With little fanfare, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has begun providing imagery for free over the Internet. Throughout the history of the Landsat Program, the cost and access to imagery has always limited our ability to study our planet and the way it is changing. Beginning with a pilot program to provide “Web-enabled” access to Landsat 7 images of the United States that were collected between 2003 and this year, the USGS now plans to provide top-quality image products for free upon request for the entire U.S. archive, including over 2 million images back to Landsat 1 (1972) [for details and schedules, see ([1][2])]. The release by NASA and the USGS in January 2008 of a new Landsat Data Distribution Policy ([2][3]) was a key step to this goal. Free imagery will enable reconstruction of the history of Earth's surface back to 1972, chronicling both anthropogenic and natural changes during a time when our population doubled and the impacts of climate change became noticeable. The Landsat Science Team: 1. 1.[↵][4]USGS Technical Announcement ([http://landsat.usgs.gov/images/squares/USGS\_Landsat\_Imagery_Release.pdf][5]). 2. 2.[↵][6]Landsat Missions ([http://ldcm.usgs.gov/pdf/Landsat\_Data\_Policy.pdf][7]). [1]: pending:yes [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1. in text [5]: http://landsat.usgs.gov/images/squares/USGS_Landsat_Imagery_Release.pdf [6]: #xref-ref-2-1 View reference 2. in text [7]: http://ldcm.usgs.gov/pdf/Landsat_Data_Policy.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5360.611

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations956
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207