MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086660285 · doi:10.1080/07060660409507147

Effect of foliar fungicide application timing on the control of bean anthracnose in the navy bean ‘Navigator’

2004· article· en· W2086660285 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R. L. Conner, D.W. McAndrew, F. A. Kiehn, S. R. Chapman, Nathan T. Froese

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBASF (Canada)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFungicidePhaseolusColletotrichum lindemuthianumBiologyHorticulturePoint of deliveryYield (engineering)CropCanopyAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bean anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, can severely reduce bean yield and seed quality. A 2-year field study at two sites in southern Manitoba examined the effect of the timing of foliar applications of the fungicide pyraclostrobin (Headline® 250 EC) on the control of bean anthracnose in navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) ‘Navigator’. Single and (or) sequential applications of pyraclostrobin at a rate of 0.1 kg active ingredient (a.i.)/ha were made at four growth stages. Single applications of pyraclostrobin, at either 3 to 5 trifoliolate leave stage, early flowering (40% bloom), late flowering (80% bloom), or 10 days after flowering, reduced disease development in the crop canopy, but had inconsistent effects on pod infection, seed discoloration, and yield. Sequential applications of pyraclostrobin at the early and late flowering stages usually resulted in the lowest disease severity on all parts of the plant and in the highest yield. Sequential applications of pyraclostrobin at the late flowering stage and 10 days after flowering were less effective in reducing anthracnose severity and seed discoloration than the earlier sequentialapplication treatment. Both sequential-application treatments of pyraclostrobin had similar yields. Under Manitoba growing conditions, seed-borne infection by C. lindemuthianum resulted in yield reductions that ranged from 15.2% to 32.1% in the untreated bean plots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207