MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086661183 · doi:10.1063/1.4731478

Fuchsian Riemann-Hilbert problem for “real doubles” of Hurwitz Frobenius manifolds

2012· article· en· W2086661183 on OpenAlexaff
Hussein Khreibani, Vasilisa Shramchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeromorphic functionMathematicsMonodromyPure mathematicsRiemann surfaceRiemann hypothesisMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A solution to the matrix Fuchsian Riemann-Hilbert problem (inverse monodromy problem) corresponding to “real doubles” of Dubrovin's Frobenius structures on Hurwitz spaces is constructed. The solution is given in terms of certain meromorphic differentials integrated over a basis of an appropriate relative homology space of the Riemann surface. The relationship with the solution of Fuchsian Riemann-Hilbert problem for Dubrovin's Hurwitz Frobenius manifolds is established. A solution of the Riemann-Hilbert problem corresponding to deformations of the “real doubles” is also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207