MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086672360 · doi:10.1159/000293716

Significant Difference in the Frequency of Out-of-Phase Endometrial Biopsies Depending on the Use of the Novak Curette or the Flexible Polypropylene Endometrial Biopsy Cannula (‘Pipelle')

2010· article· en· W2086672360 on OpenAlexaff
Louis H. Honor eacute, David C. Cumming, N. R. Fahmy

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuretteCannulaBiopsyLuteal phaseMedicineEndometrial biopsySignificant differenceCurettageSurgeryGynecologyRadiologyFollicular phaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A statistically significant difference in the frequency of out-of-phase biopsies was found on comparison of day dating in two sequential series of late luteal endometrial biopsies taken with the standard 4-mm stainless steel Novak curette and a polypropylene cannula ('Pipelle'). Since the only variable in these two series was the type of biopsy instrument used, it is suggested that the diagnosis of inadequate luteal phase can be affected by an extrinsic non-biological factor, i.e., the type of biopsy instrument used. This technical 'artifact' deserves further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic and Obstetric InvestigationSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207