Qualitative and numerical study of the matter-radiation interaction in Kantowski-Sachs cosmologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine, from both a qualitative and a numerical point of view, the evolution of Kantowski-Sachs cosmological models whose source is a mixture of a gas of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP's) and a radiative gas made up of a ``tightly coupled'' mixture of electrons, baryons and photons. Our analysis is valid from the end of nucleosynthesis up to the duration of radiative interactions ${(10}^{6}\mathrm{K}>T>4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{3}\mathrm{K}).$ In this cosmic era annihilation processes are negligible, while the WIMP's only interact gravitationally with the radiative gas and the latter behaves as a single dissipative fluid that can be studied within a hydrodynamical framework. Applying the full transport equations of extended irreversible thermodynamics, coupled with the field and balance equations, we obtain a set of governing equations that becomes an autonomous system of ordinary differential equations once the shear viscosity relaxation time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{rel}}$ is specified. Assuming that ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{rel}}$ is proportional to the Hubble time, the qualitative analysis indicates that models begin in the radiation-dominated epoch close to an isotropic equilibrium point (saddle). We show how the form of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{rel}}$ governs the relaxation time scale of the models towards an equilibrium photon entropy, leading to ``near-Eckart'' and transient regimes associated with ``abrupt'' and ``smooth'' relaxation processes, respectively. Assuming the WIMP particle to be a supersymmetric neutralino with a mass ${m}_{\mathrm{w}}\ensuremath{\sim}100\mathrm{GeV},$ the numerical analysis reveals that a physically plausible evolution, compatible with a stable equilibrium state and with observed bounds on CMB anisotropies and neutralino abundance, is only possible for models characterized by initial conditions associated with nearly zero spatial curvature and total initial energy density close to unity. An expression for the relaxation time, complying with physical requirements, is obtained in terms of the dynamical equations. It is also shown that the ``truncated'' transport equation does not give rise to acceptable physics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".