MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086695416 · doi:10.1063/1.2741606

Acoustic dispersion in a ball-shaped surface acoustic wave device

2007· article· en· W2086695416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface acoustic waveDiffractionAttenuationCollimated lightAcoustic waveOpticsAcousticsSurface acoustic wave sensorPhysical acousticsPlanarSurface waveAcoustic wave equationPhysicsDispersion (optics)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical model for ball surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors has been developed. Wave front distortion encountered in planar SAW sensors caused by diffraction or reflection can be neglected because of the diffraction-free propagation of a naturally collimated beam. Wave form at each turn is expressed by an integral of terms defined by the array factor and the elementary charge density of electrodes as well as the frequency-dependent velocity and attenuation caused by the sensitive film. Irrespective of the significant simplicity of the theory, excellent agreement has been observed between the simulated and experimental wave forms of a double-electrode ball SAW sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it