MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086696778 · doi:10.1137/140978466

Local Well-Posedness of Prandtl Equations for Compressible Flow in Two Space Variables

2015· article· en· W2086696778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsMathematicsPrandtl numberMathematical analysisBoundary layerVariable (mathematics)CompressibilityFlow (mathematics)Space (punctuation)Boundary (topology)Limit (mathematics)Boundary value problemViscosityGeometryMechanicsPhysicsConvection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the local well-posedness of the Prandtl boundary layer equations that describe the behavior of the boundary layer in the small viscosity limit of the compressible isentropic Navier--Stokes equations with nonslip boundary condition. Under the strictly monotonic assumption on the tangential velocity in the normal variable, we apply the Nash--Moser--Hörmander iteration scheme and further develop the energy method introduced in [R. Alexander et al., J. Amer. Math. Soc., DOI:S0894-0347(2014)00813-4] to obtain the well-posedness of the equations locally in time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it