MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086711573 · doi:10.4043/14152-ms

Design and Implementation of the First Buoyed Steel Catenary Risers

2002· article· en· W2086711573 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas R. Korth, Bob Shian J. Chou, Gary D. McCullough

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatenarySubseaCanyonMarine engineeringEngineeringTension (geology)BuoyancyPetroleumGeologyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the design and implementation of buoyed steel catenary risers (SCR). Two 6" steel catenary risers, installed in November-December 2001, were designed to include 50,000-pounds of buoyancy per riser in 3,300 feet of water for Mariner Energy, Inc.'s King Kong/Yosemite field development in the Green Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico. The risers are suspended from the Agip Petroleum "Allegheny" tension leg platform (TLP) where reduced riser loads were required for additional process equipment and safe TLP operation. Introduction The King Kong/Yosemite development consists of three subsea gas wells located in Green Canyon Blocks 472, 473 and 516 in water depths of 3,800 - 3,900 feet. The subsea wells are commingled at a manifold located in Green Canyon block 472 into two 7" production flowlines. These 7" flowlines transit approximately 15 miles to Green Canyon Block 254, in 3,300-foot water depth, where they transition to 6" SCRs to board the Agip Petroleum "Allegheny" mini Tension Leg Platform, (TLP). The field layout is pictured in Figure A-1. The riser locations near the platform are illustrated in Figure A-2. During the course of the riser design, and after order of riser pipe and titanium stress joints, it was discovered that the weight of additional process equipment and the planned SCRs placed the Allegheny TLP beyond its allowable load capacity. In order to maintain a safe load budget for the TLP and to account for future process equipment addition it was decided to reduce the total TLP load by 100-kips via buoyancy on the risers. The challenge involved making a buoyed riser system work within the constraints of a non-buoyed, simple catenary SCR. The buoyed riser design involved an iterative approach to optimize the riser and buoyancy to satisfy the requirements for design codes, S-Lay installation and project cost and schedule constraints. The position and characteristics of the buoyancy were important to produce a riser catenary that met project requirements and code stress and fatigue criteria. In the final configuration, each riser utilizes 271 separate, surface installed buoyancy modules applied over a continuous length of 800-feet, starting below the VIV strakes, to provide 50-kips of net buoyancy plus a 5% safety factor. The resultant riser has an arc length of 3,532-feet with a horizontal offset of 1028-feet at a departure angle of 8°. Figure A-3 illustrates the final riser configuration. The final profile of the riser is a shallow "S" exhibiting a slight double catenary. Analysis shows that, compared to a conventional SCR, the buoyed riser exhibits increased bending and dynamic stress in the sagbend. This results from the "lighter" SCR motion characteristics and the departure from the second catenary, best illustrated as a shorter horizontal offset to touchdown than conventional simple catenary SCRs. Riser stresses are managed by placement, distribution and size of buoyancy modules. Execution of this project demonstrates the viability of the buoyed SCR for deepwater developments and how this concept can be used to expand or enhance the capacity of floating production systems. This paper presents the design and implementation of the buoyed steel catenary risers (SCR) for the Mariner Energy, Inc., King Kong/Yosemite field development. Included is an overall description of the riser key parameters; design including static, dynamic, vortex induced and wave fatigue analyses; and installation experience. In the description of the static analysis, comparing and contrasting results of the original simple catenary SCR, the final buoyed SCR configuration and one of the iterative buoyed SCR configurations examined before selec

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207