MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086715827 · doi:10.3406/galia.2000.3022

L'apparition des meules rotatives en Languedoc oriental (IVe s. avant J.-C.) d'après l'étude du site de Lattes

2000· article· en· W2086715827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Louis Reille

Bibliographic record

VenueGallia · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchaeologyPetrographyGeographyOutcropPeriod (music)ArtGeologyGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petrographic analysis was applied to 4th century BC millstones from the Protohistoric lagoonal harbour of Lattes (southern France, near Montpellier), in order to locate their origin. The most important quarrying centre was located in the lower valley of Hérault river, near the basaltic outcrops of Saint-Thibéry/Bessan. There are no archaeological field traces about this hypothetic worksite, only known through its products. According to present data, it furnished the oldest rotary millstones excavated in eastern Languedoc and Provence (first quarter of 4th century BC). From several facts, one may suppose that its production takes roots in the Iberic local technical culture. Nevertheless, it was probably early integrated into the big commercial activity of the Greek colony of Agde. Comparatively, during this period, the famous quarries of « Embonne/Cap d'Agde » seem to be commercially relegated to the background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGalliaSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207