MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086724546 · doi:10.3103/s1068364x14070084

Assessing the condition of coke

2014· article· en· W2086724546 on OpenAlex
Yu. V. Stepanov, V. S. Yakimov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoke and Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCoal and Coke Industries Research
Canadian institutionsEVRAZ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCokeYield (engineering)Waste managementEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyProcess engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceEngineeringPulp and paper industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As shown by critical analysis, a recent article by Rubchevskii and his colleagues failed to adequately review methods of assessing the condition of coke [1]. A method developed in the central laboratory of the coke plant at OAO EVRAZ NTMK has long been used to assess the condition of coke in terms of the difference in the yield of volatiles (ΔV daf ) between coke breeze (V cb ) and coke (V c ). This method is simpler, more convenient, and more precise than the determination of the bulk yield of volatiles from coke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it