MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086733488 · doi:10.7202/040822ar

Le Cirque du Monde et la Nation Atikamekw : une expression du mouvement paradigmatique autour des jeunes qui vivent des difficultés

2009· article· fr· W2086733488 on OpenAlex
Jacinthe Rivard, Céline Mercier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Canadian Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCirquePolitical scienceArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Haute Mauricie, le Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw(CNA), en partenariat avec le programme Cirque du Monde (CdM), offre des ateliers decirque à des jeunes Atikamekw vivant des difficultés. Admettant d’emblée quechaque site où intervient CdM représente une actualisation particulière de sonmodèle général, l’objet du présent article est double. Premièrement, ilexaminera en quoi et comment les ateliers de cirque offerts aux jeunes autochtonespeuvent fournir des éléments essentiels à la compréhension de l’approche duCdM. Deuxièmement, à partir de ces données, il présentera les dimensions de ce quiapparaît être plus largement un mouvement paradigmatique autour du phénomène desjeunes qui vivent des difficultés, dans un passage du local au global.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it