MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086773079 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.144112

Low-frequency dielectric spectroscopy of the relaxor ferroelectric<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PbTiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W2086773079 on OpenAlexaff
Alexei A. Bokov, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsFerroelectricityDielectricRelaxation (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex dielectric permittivity $(\ensuremath{\varepsilon}={\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}i{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}^{\ensuremath{''}})$ of relaxor ferroelectric $0.75\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Mg}}_{1/3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2/3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}0.25{\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$ ceramics with perovskite-type structure is studied in the frequency range of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}--{10}^{5}\mathrm{Hz}$ as a function of temperature. The dielectric response in the temperature range of the diffused $\ensuremath{\varepsilon}(T)$ peak is determined by contributions from two different polarization mechanisms: ``universal relaxor polarization'' and ``conventional relaxor polarization.'' The overlapping dielectric responses related to these two polarization mechanisms are separated from each other and studied individually. The conventional relaxor polarization shows Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts relaxation behavior with a temperature-independent spectral shape and a non-Arrhenius (linear) temperature dependence of the logarithm of the most probable relaxation frequency. The universal response is characterized by the susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{U}$ continuously growing (without any loss peak) with decreasing frequency according to the universal relaxation law ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{U}\ensuremath{\propto}{f}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}.$ The real part of the universal relaxor susceptibility shows a critical behavior ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{U}^{\ensuremath{'}}{=C}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}(T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{0}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ at $T&gt;{T}_{0},$ starting from a temperature several degrees above ${T}_{0}.$ The parameters ${C}_{\ensuremath{\chi}}$ and ${T}_{0}$ slightly depend on frequency according to fractional power relations. We show that it is the universal relaxor dispersion, not the conventional relaxor dispersion, that is related to the freezing of dipole dynamics which is characteristic of relaxor ferroelectrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.013
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0180.013
Research integrity0.0150.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9810.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207