MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086775974 · doi:10.29173/cais386

Seeking God’s Will: The Experience of Information Seeking by Leaders of a Church in Transition

2013· article· fr· W2086775974 on OpenAlex
David Michels

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrayerFaithTransition (genetics)Diversity (politics)EthnographyInformation seekingPublic relationsSociologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyPsychologyReligious studiesTheologyLawPhilosophyAnthropologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I explored the perspectives of leaders of churches in transition seeking to answer the question "what is God’s will for our church?" This is significant because religious information seeking has received little attention. Issues arising were feelings of frustration, the impact of digital media, and the role of prayer.J'ai exploré le point de vue des dirigeants religieux d'églises en transition cherchant à répondre à la question : « Quelle est la volonté de Dieu pour notre église? ». Cette étude est importante, car la recherche d'information en contexte religieux n'a reçu que très peu d'attention. Les enjeux observés comprennent le sentiment de frustration, l'impact des médias numériques et le rôle de la prière.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.021
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it