The Adult Mouse Dentate Gyrus Contains Populations of Committed Progenitor Cells that are Distinct from Subependymal Zone Neural Stem Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is currently a debate as to whether or not a neural stem cell (NSC) exists in the adult mammalian hippocampus. Clonal colony-forming assays allow single cells to cells to be evaluated for stem cell properties: self-renewal and multipotentiality. In these in vitro assays, single cells from the subependymal zone (SEZ) of the adult lateral ventricle yield large colonies which self-renew and are multipotential, while single cells from the adult dentate gyrus (DG) produce small, unipotent, and nonself-renewing colonies. We find that multipotential and long-term self-renewing colonies can be isolated only from the early embryonic hippocampus, before the formation of the DG. No movement of progenitors from the postnatal SEZ to the newly forming DG subgranular zone is detected and adult DG colonies in vitro originate from the embryonic hippocampal primordium. These data support a model where embryonic hippocampal NSCs change their properties as the organism ages. When adult DG spheres are cocultured with embryonic brain slices, self-renewal (but not multipotentiality) is restored and maintained for several passages off of slices. Adult clonal DG spheres grown on embryonic brain slices or transplanted into brains of neonatal mice do not give rise to neurons. Neurons arise from separate, small clones that are approximately 10 times more frequent than sphere colonies in vitro and may be responsible for maintaining neurogenesis in the adult in vivo. We propose that there are separate glial and neuronal clones in the adult hippocampus, with glial progenitors being the most proliferative in culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".