MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086837700 · doi:10.1524/zpch.2009.6065

Correlation of Static and Dynamic Heterogeneities in Supercooled Water by Means of Molecular Dynamics Simulations

2009· article· en· W2086837700 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jörg Holzmann, Andreas Appelhagen, Ralf Ludwig

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftWilfrid Laurier University
KeywordsSupercoolingMolecular dynamicsThermal diffusivityTetrahedronCompression (physics)ThermodynamicsMaterials scienceDiffusionLiquid waterPhysicsChemistryCrystallographyComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The unusual increase of diffusivity of supercooled water upon compression seems to be related to the existence of at least two major distinct local structural forms: a "low-density" structure, exhibiting an almost perfect tetrahedral hydrogen bonding network, and a "high-density" structure, characterized by defects in this network. The structural changes can be measured by the "tetrahedricity parameter", describing the deviation from the ideal tetrahedron. In this paper we show that the anomalous diffusion behavior upon compression cannot only be related to the structural heterogeneities but also to dynamical heterogeneities occuring in supercooled liquid water. This is shown for translational heterogeneities which decrease with temperature and pressure. Both, static and dynamic heterogeneities can be correlated. They are substantial at low temperatures and moderate pressures and diminish with increasing temperature and pressure, respectively. Our results are based on molecular dynamics simulations of the TIP4P-Ew water model [1].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Physikalische ChemieSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207