Experimental Study of Oblong Exhaust Ejectors With Multi-Ring Oblong Entraining Diffusers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents experimental data for the performance of two oblong, straight, air-air ejectors with 4-ring oblong entraining diffusers. The effects of inlet swirl angle, nozzle diameter and flow temperature on the ejector pumping, back pressure, wall pressure distribution, diffuser pressure recovery and surface film cooling effectiveness were studied. The experiments were carried out on a hot gas wind tunnel that could provide primary mass flow rates up to 2.2 kg/s at ambient temperature and 1.8 kg/s at 500°C. Velocity, pressure and temperature were measured in the annulus upstream of the primary nozzle, on the mixing tube and diffuser walls, at the diffuser gap inlets and at the diffuser exit. A comparison between the performance of the oblong ejector and a round ejector indicated that for a short length ejector, the oblong ejector provided better overall performance in terms of pumping and velocity and temperature distributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".