Interactions between 12-EO<i><sub>x</sub></i>-12 Gemini Surfactants and Pluronic ABA Block Copolymers (F108 and P103) Studied by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions between triblock copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide), P103 and F108, EO(n)PO(m)EO(n), m = 56 and n = 17 and 132, respectively, and gemini surfactants (oligooxa)-alkanediyl-alpha,omega-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide) (12-EO(x)-12), x = 0-3, have been studied in aqueous solution using isothermal titration calorimetry. The thermograms of F108 as a function of surfactant concentration show one broad peak at polymer concentrations, Cp, < or =0.50 wt %, below the critical micelle concentration (cmc) of the copolymer at 25 degrees C. It is attributed to interactions between the surfactant and the triblock copolymer monomer. The critical aggregation concentration (cac) remains constant while deltaHmax2 and the saturation concentration, C2, increase with increasing copolymer concentration. Analysis of the cac data offers semiquantitative support that the degree of ionization of the surfactant aggregates bound to polymers is likely to be larger than that at the surfactant cmc. In P103 solutions at Cp > or = 0.05 wt %, two peaks appear in the thermograms and they are attributed to the interactions between the gemini surfactant and the micelle or monomeric forms of the copolymer. An origin-based nonlinear fitting program was employed to deconvolute the two peaks and to obtain estimates of peak properties. An estimate of the fraction of copolymer in aggregated form was also obtained. The enthalpy change due to interactions between the surfactants and P103 aggregates is very large compared to values obtained for traditional surfactants. This suggests that extensive reorganization of copolymer aggregates and surrounding solvent occurs during the interaction. Dehydration of the copolymers by the surfactant may also play an important step in the interaction. The endothermic enthalpy change reflecting interactions between the surfactant and polymer decreases more rapidly as the length and hydrophilic character of the spacer increases, suggesting that more favorable interactions occur with the P103 monomers having shorter PEO segments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".