Application of Various Combustion Models to a Generic Combustor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow-field of a generic gas combustor with interior and exterior conjugate heat transfers was numerically studied. Results obtained from three combustion models, combined with the re-normalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model, discrete ordinates radiation model, and partial equilibrium NOx model are presented and discussed. The numerical results are compared with a comprehensive database obtained from a series of experimental tests. The flow patterns and the recirculation zone length are excellently predicted, and the mean axial velocities are in fairly good agreement with the experimental measurements, particularly at downstream sections for all three combustion models. The mean temperature profiles are also fairly well captured by the probability density function (PDF) and eddy dissipation (EDS) combustion models. The EDS-finite-rate combustion model fails to provide acceptable temperature field. In general, the PDF shows some superiority over the EDS and EDS-finite-rate models. NOx levels predicted by the EDS model are in reasonable agreement with the experimental measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".