MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perioperative Blood Transfusion Therapy in Pediatric Patients

2002· review· en· W2086867305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Therapeutics · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCryoprecipitateFresh frozen plasmaPerioperativeBlood transfusionDosingIntensive care medicineBlood managementPlateletAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In general, transfusion guidelines for non-neonatal pediatric patients are similar to those for adults. However, some differences do exist and certain precautions may be necessary particularly in the setting of massive transfusions. We review these differences as they apply to general pediatric surgery outside of the neonatal period, with respect to the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and cryoprecipitate. We include a discussion of the indications for transfusion and practical considerations such as dosing and administration. Finally, we briefly review the use of directed donations and specialized (irradiated, CMV seronegative) blood components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it