FACTORY OCCUPATIONS IN ONTARIO, CANADA: REBUILDING INFRASTRUCTURES OF RESISTANCE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses recent developments, including occupations and radical workers centers in the context of rank‐and‐file resistance and alternative organizing, and emerging challenges to union bureaucracies, in the current period in Canada's industrial heartland. Occupations provide a possibly crucial turning point in the working‐class response to capitalist economic crisis and in the formation and structure of working‐class organizing and struggle. In order to properly understand the development of occupations it is important to look at the present context of their emergence. This means situating occupations within the limiting practices of legal union structures. It also means, crucially, looking at the erosion of working‐class infrastructures of resistance, those institutions and spaces that have sustained struggles of the working classes and the oppressed, and situating occupations as part of broader attempts to renew those infrastructures. Infrastructures of resistance help people and communities to develop the capacities to sustain human struggles over time and place. They provide a basis for self‐directing these struggles strategically. They also allow for the crucial connection between local and immediate struggles and campaigns and broader and more thoroughgoing projects of contesting existing social structures. The article includes a discussion of attempts to (re)build infrastructures of resistance in Windsor, Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it