MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086914214 · doi:10.7202/042490ar

Les implications morales de certaines dispositions législatives concernant l'avortement

2005· article· en· W2086914214 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michel Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionCriminal codePenal codeLegislationSection (typography)Interpretation (philosophy)Political scienceLawSubject matterSubject (documents)SociologyCriminal lawHumanitiesPregnancyPhilosophyLibrary scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abortion in Canada is mainly settled by S. 251 of the Canadian Criminal Code. The section states that abortion is a criminal act except when a therapeutic abortion committee for an approved hospital is of the opinion that the continuation of the pregnancy is or is likely to endanger the woman's life or health. As it now stands, the section is subject to considerable interpretation. Morals is one of the most fundamental aspects of abortion. Our legislation on the matter should reflect much aspect, first by "discriminatizing" abortion and, secondly, by recourse to social measures insuring the mother a real choice after proper consideration in ethics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.035
Scholarly communication0.0140.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droitSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207